Red Teaming (full-scope)
Objective-driven adversary simulation that tests detection, response, and leadership decision-making, not just whether a vulnerability exists.
Complete adversary simulation for evaluating your organization's security.
Why teams engage us
Penetration tests find flaws; red teams measure how your organization behaves when someone intelligent is trying to win. Without that pressure test, boards and executives often assume controls work in concert when they only work in isolation. Attackers do not respect scope spreadsheets.
What we deliver
We plan and execute a controlled adversary simulation against agreed objectives, commonly spanning identity, network, cloud, and applications, using realistic tradecraft and disciplined rules of engagement. The emphasis is on chains: how far an actor can progress, what telemetry appears, how responders act, and where process breaks. You receive technical evidence, an executive narrative, and remediation priorities grounded in what actually happened.
How we run it
- Scoping: objectives, constraints, legal/comms boundaries, success criteria
- Threat modeling: likely paths, crown jewels, and scenario seeds
- Operations: iterative adversary actions with evidence capture
- Detection collaboration: controlled touchpoints where agreed
- Reporting: technical and executive layers with remediation mapping
Outcomes you can expect
- Validated view of detection and response under realistic pressure
- Clear attack narrative leadership can understand and act on
- Prioritized improvements across technology, process, and people
- Evidence suitable for regulatory or customer conversations where appropriate
Why Evaluris
- •Operator-led tradecraft across AD, cloud, and modern application stacks.
- •We report for both engineers and boards, no translation gap.
- •Scenarios can incorporate AI and LLM attack surfaces where in scope.
Deliverables
- Detailed report
- Executive presentation
- Improvement recommendations
When it makes sense
- •Before major audits
- •After significant infrastructure changes
- •Annual security validation
FAQ
How is this different from a penetration test?
Penetration testing optimizes for breadth of vulnerabilities and validation of specific technical issues. Red teaming optimizes for realistic adversary behavior, persistence, and evasion, testing people and processes as much as software. Many organizations need both at different cadences.
Will production be impacted?
We design scenarios to minimize availability risk. Sensitive actions use agreed guardrails, canary systems, or lab mirrors when needed. Any higher-risk technique is pre-approved in writing.
Can you align scenarios to MITRE ATT&CK?
Yes. We map observed behavior to ATT&CK for reporting and detection gap analysis, without treating the framework as a rigid checklist.
Related offerings
Purple Teaming Sessions
Collaboration between Red and Blue teams for continuous security improvement.
ViewAdversary Simulation
Advanced simulation of techniques and tactics used by real adversaries.
ViewBreach & Attack Simulation
Continuous automated attack simulation for validating security controls.
ViewReady to scope this engagement?
Tell us about your environment, timelines, and objectives, we will respond with a tailored proposal.